The brand new ? 2 take to revealed zero matchmaking ranging from age and you may pride invention

The brand new ? 2 take to revealed zero matchmaking ranging from age and you may pride invention

All of the teachers from the data was indeed certified Enneagram instructors on the Story Heritage. This new Enneagram Circuit training Programs utilized five pri type of boards, (2) didactic reading, (3) reflection training, and you will (4) experiential mining. Enneagram Intensive Courses instructors observed a plan entitled The newest Enneagram Rigorous®: Partnering Psychological dominican cupid dating apps Life and Soul.

The three Introductory courses integrated pri learning strategies. The fresh Berkeley direction provided everyday Enneagram type of boards and you can didactic understanding. New Minnesota path put all of your own number one learning methods. The fresh new Palo Alto path utilized Enneagram form of panels, didactic reading, and you can experiential exploration for example led visualization.

Studies Investigation

Questionnaires was in fact typed by the a research secretary and sent to an effective Cook-Greuter-authoritative SCT scorer (Hy and you can Loevinger 1996) via post mail. Password quantity were used and so the rater try blind so you’re able to the type of the decide to try, the times of attempt, and education group form of. The latest scorer observed the education by the Susan Plan-Greuter, utilizing the modern Loevinger instructions, except for stems outside of the guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Obtained answers was delivered back towards the experts inside a get noticed give piece which was after that employed for data data. To make sure precision of your scoring to possess contributes to and that players went upwards or off a couple of values, a sample of those education has also been obtained by Create-Greuter herself.


An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.

Since there are alot more older than younger adults inside test, an analysis was used to evaluate the connection between generation and you can degree impression. Altogether, 40 members (33%, n = ) increased a minumum of one level following the degree. Proportionally, a whole lot more fifty–59 year olds (45%, n = ) compared to other age groups enhanced a minumum of one stages just after the training (20%, n = 1/5, under 29; 0%, letter = 0/step three, 30–39 seasons olds; 25%, letter = 7/twenty eight, 40–forty-two year olds; and twenty four%, letter = 8/33, 60+ seasons olds). To look at if or not it trend try statistically high, an excellent ? dos attempt off liberty is determined of the researching ages group and you will whether a person educated ego phase growth of you to definitely or more amount adopting the input (or not).

A diagnosis was also used to evaluate the partnership between fellow member intercourse and you can knowledge impact. Although proportionally, more ladies (36%, letter = ) than men (18%, n = 4/22) advanced no less than one degrees pursuing the degree, a great ? 2 sample regarding versatility shown no relationship between gender and you can ego invention.

Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.

Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.

Leave a Reply